This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++] Option to allow symbol versioning

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:35:58 -0800
Subject: Re: [libstdc++] Option to allow symbol versioning
References: <20020214135119.C24687@redhat.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.1020214141547.7975B-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>

On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 02:26:28PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> Say GLIBCPP_3.1? And CXXABI_1 for libsupc++?

Sounds reasonable.

> (BTW, Something I'd been meaning to ask: shouldn't libsupc++ be renamed 
> to libcxa?)

*shrug* I don't know that it makes much difference.  I thought
there was a bit more in libsupc++ than the CXXABI_1 symbols.

r~

References:
- Re: [libstdc++] Option to allow symbol versioning
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [libstdc++] Option to allow symbol versioning
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]