This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: resolve libstdc++/5198
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Roman Zippel <zippel at linux-m68k dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:11:59 -0800
- Subject: Re: resolve libstdc++/5198
- References: <20020123174001.A994@redhat.com> <3C505A75.6060102@linux-m68k.org>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:03:17PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> add.l is only atomic local to the cpu, so that would be only a problem
> for m68k smp systems. I heard of rumors that such machines would exist,
> but does gcc support them?
As much as we support any other smp system. That is, the compiler
couldn't care less.
Anyway, m68k is freaky in saving so much state on faults, I didn't
know if it would save intermediate results when faulting in the
middle of an indirect memory thing.
r~