This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [PATCH] More implicit typename fixes
Nathan Myers <ncm-nospam@cantrip.org> writes:
| On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:54:42AM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
| > >>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Myers <ncm-nospam@cantrip.org> writes:
| >
| > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:58:51PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
| > >> Nathan Myers wrote:
| > >>
| > >> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 10:44:29PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
| > >> > > typedef typename ctype::mask mask; <====== 169
| > >> >
| > > Actually, looking deeper, it [might] be better just to use
| > > using ctype_base::mask;
| > > if it works.
| >
| > That doesn't help the compiler to see that it's a type, so I don't
| > think it should.
|
| I think that since ctype_base is not a template, it can be looked up
| in phase one, and all its details (not just its typeness) known during
| parsing of member templates. Am I wrong?
Not from my understanding.
-- Gaby