Re: stl_alloc.h

[Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>]

In article <20011126220525.A9575@disaster.jaj.com>,
Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:

>> In addition to the issues you raised about the SGI STL: I would also
>> support removing all threading support other than the gthread path

> Reading stl_threads.h has been giving me the screaming heebie-jeebies; it
> never really made sense how many of those paths we were actively trying
> to support, and how many were just sort of "there".  I'm a bit nervous
> about changing this one since I don't fully comprehend the gthr-* stuff.
> Do you have time to take the axe to this header?

I would love to hack this monster down to reasonable size for you.  I
will privately send you the patch when I start testing it.  Public
posting of said patch will occur when I ask permission to apply. ;-)

Regards,
Loren