This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Spelling patch for code
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:12:36 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: Spelling patch for code
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Index: acinclude.m4
> ===================================================================
> - # which cant create executables. So we include AC_EXEEXT to keep
> - # automake happy, but we dont execute it, since we dont care about
> + # which can't create executables. So we include AC_EXEEXT to keep
> + # automake happy, but we don't execute it, since we don't care about
I believe that for formal texts and documentation "cannot" should be
used instead of "can't".
Ger ``not a native speaker, though'' ald