This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: basic_string - once more...

From: Stefan Olsson <stefan at noname4us dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:11:17 +0100
Subject: Re: basic_string - once more...
Organization: Noname4us
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1011120194620.26786B-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>

If it was posted to the list, please give me some pointer to it because i can't find anything else than the reserve() bug discussion and this is a allocation issue.

Thanks!

/Stefan

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

Paolo just posted a patch around this issue. When it gets in, you should
try it.
-benjamin
> Our specific application relies hevily on map's and such containers and
> the performance and level of memory fragementation that the current
> stdc++ generates is to high...

-- 
Military intelligence is a contradiction in terms.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: basic_string - once more...
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- Re: basic_string - once more...
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]