This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [libstdc++] Docs, comments, and formatting tweaks
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 19:54:01 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: [libstdc++] Docs, comments, and formatting tweaks
> The run_doxygen script does a lot of cleanup and rearranging after the pages
> are generated. Fortunately it doesn't need to be super-duper-extra-portable;
> this is something that would probably only be run by:
>
> - system vendors/integrators
> - me :-)
Yes. That's fine. I'm representing one of the vendors that is planning on
using this, so please let me know if there are substantial issues.
> I've a couple more minor nits to pick, and then I want to roll another
> tarball of generated HTML docs, and (for the first time) generated man pages.
> It's been a while since anything was put up on the FTP site.
Sounds great.
> Hm, are we still going to be doing library snapshots?
Yeah. I've been planning on doing this for about two months now.
My thought is:
3.0.95 - gnulocale complete, default to on
3.0.96 - wide io
3.0.97 - optimization, bug fixes
etc till 3.1. Obviously there are other priorities and plans, so I'd like
to hear them. I was thinking 3.0.95 no later than Dec 15, 2001.
I figure we could tag the CVS sources with the release, and provide a
tarball that could replace the gcc-3.0.x libstdc++-v3 directory, and
provide a way for people using stable compilers to try the new library.
Call me crazy..
-benjamin