This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: Proposal for the 'long long' problems
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 11:45:24 -0500
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20011030181416.A30362@disaster.jaj.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.1011031193650.16010A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com> <20011101113524.A6747@disaster.jaj.com> <flu1webg7w.fsf@riz.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 05:36:51PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:
> | I like it. We can make it even easier:
> |
> | Modified modified proposal:
> |
> | The pieces of cpp_type_traits.h, type_traits.h, and boost_concept_check.h
> | now guarded by _USE_LONG_LONG are not guarded at all.
>
> what about numeric_limits<long long> ?
I say, also unguarded. There's "only" macros and compiler support there
too, no C library calls that I can see.
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams