This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Question/problem related to _Bool in type_traits.h

To: Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>
Subject: Re: Question/problem related to _Bool in type_traits.h
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
Date: 16 Oct 2001 16:05:23 +0200
Cc: stephen at breagmasoft dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <p05100304b7f12c0840c0@[17.202.44.152]> <01101608432800.11932@swebb-slack> <20011016151051.A7572@alinoe.com>

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> writes:

| Why not removing the '#define _Bool   bool' from 3.0's stdbool.h?

Tha won't solve our problem.

| I don't think people should use _Bool in user applications when
| compiling C++ programs with 3.x?  They should use 'bool' that is
| the whole point of stdbool.h, so you can use 'bool' regardless.

But C++ gets mixed with C99 in real world.

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Question/problem related to _Bool in type_traits.h
  - From: Ira Ruben
- Re: Question/problem related to _Bool in type_traits.h
  - From: Stephen M. Webb
- Re: Question/problem related to _Bool in type_traits.h
  - From: Carlo Wood

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]