Re: [libstdc++] Notes on threading and I/O

[Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>]

On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 12:03:25AM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> To say that the answer is ``no'' conflicts with information given
> elsewhere.

I didn't read the text there, I must admit.  Just s/2.92/3.0/ really.


> It is better, IMHO, to state under which conditions the
> library is thread-safe than to ``just say no'':

Can you go ahead and apply this patch?


> No offense, but we should lose all references to "Received Wisdom"
> since we sound more like a cult manual than a technical FAQ. ;-)

At the time it felt like we were a small cult.  :-)  Yeah, those can all go.


Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams