This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: aug-2001 libstdc++ outstanding

To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: aug-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 19:05:29 -0400
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010930125818.A13214@disaster.jaj.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010904103812.3011A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>

On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:41:26AM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> > Dunno.  From what I've garnered on the newsgroups, this seems to be a
> > language issue with a known workaround.
> 
> Ok. can I call this resolved?

I think so.  While having to re-open namespace std in order to declare op<<
with a pair<>-of-whatever's is not intuitive to the beginner, it seems to be
required by the language, as far as I can get people to talk about it.  :-)

Phil

-- 
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
                                     - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: aug-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- Re: aug-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: aug-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]