This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: aug-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Subject: Re: aug-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
hopefully month summaries will start again. june,july still need to
happen, a lot of stuff got dropped.
> I'm gonna post the current patches for concept checks as they are in my
> local tree, if I can remember to do so.
thanks
> Dunno. From what I've garnered on the newsgroups, this seems to be a
> language issue with a known workaround.
Ok. can I call this resolved?
> > 2001-08-09
> > Opinions on libstdc++/3955 patch?
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-08/msg00066.html
>
> I posted an article to the newsgroups asking what the intention was,
> but got nothing back; I still think the patch should be applied.
I'm pretty sure that this patch is wrong. I remember talking to Nathan
about this when I first started on the stringstream code, and distinctly
remember the current behavior as being what was intended. (I believe
other vendors also implement similar semantics.)
That's not super-authoritative though, so perhaps somebody can research
this. I thought this had come up on the library list or as a NAD defect
report.
-benjamin