This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: aug-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: aug-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:58:18 -0400
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200109041717.f84HHE618540@constant.com>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:17:14AM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> If I've missed something major, please clue me in.
I'm gonna post the current patches for concept checks as they are in my
local tree, if I can remember to do so.
> 2001-08-17
> PR 4051
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-08/msg00152.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-08/msg00173.html
Dunno. From what I've garnered on the newsgroups, this seems to be a
language issue with a known workaround.
> 2001-08-09
> Opinions on libstdc++/3955 patch?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-08/msg00066.html
I posted an article to the newsgroups asking what the intention was,
but got nothing back; I still think the patch should be applied.
Phil
--
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC