This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: libstdc++ bootstrap failures on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 (analyzed)
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: libstdc++ bootstrap failures on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 (analyzed)
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 01 Aug 2001 05:40:08 +0200
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <200107312116.RAA26308@makai.watson.ibm.com> <flsnfcdc80.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010731170806.B4763@redhat.com>
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:23:43PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Because we're going to try to run a 64-bit app on a system running
| > 32-bit, can't we predict it will fail? If so, why should we try to run
| > it in the first place?
|
| Because the build machinery doesn't know that it's a 32 vs 64
| bit thing. All it knows is that it's yet another multilib.
OK, thanks for the education.
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:57:14PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
| > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-06/msg00338.html
|
| That does seem to be the right approach.
OK. Thanks.
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com