This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] documentation on cstdio and synchronization
- To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: [v3] documentation on cstdio and synchronization
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:13:12 -0400
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010709154244.A6658@disaster.jaj.com> <3B4A0E02.1C8C28C5@codesourcery.com>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 09:03:14PM +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > <A HREF="http://sources.redhat.com/glibc/";>glibc</A>,
> > + <DT><TT>--enable-sjlj-exceptions </TT>
> > + <DD><P>Forces old, short-jump/long-jump exception handling model. If
> set-jump/long-jump (isn't it?)
Hey, I don't write 'em, I just indent and reformat 'em. But yeah, that
should be set-jump if I recall.
> > + thing is <A HREF="../explanations.html#cstdio">tricky to get right</A>.)
> > + The upside is that correctness is insured. The downside is that
> ensured (we wouldn't want people
> submitting claims to us about their program's correctness being broken, would we?)
Okay, sometimes I do write 'em... Dunno what I was thinking about. :-)
Thanks!
Phil
--
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC