This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Does libstdc++ v3 not work with Canadian crosses?
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:04:06AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz <email@example.com> wrote:
> > # If Canadian cross, then don't pick up tools from the build
> > # directory.
> > if test x"$build" != x"$with_cross_host" && x"$build" != x"$target"; then
> > There'd better be a "test" after that "&&" unless my installed shells
> > have diverged from everyone else's.
> Yup, this is definitely wrong. Especially given that, when you
> configure the top-level with a certain (build,host,target) triplet,
> target libraries such as libstdc++ are configured with
> (host,target,N/A) for (build,host,target), so testing for target in
> libstdc++'s configure is totally wrong.
Is that really true?
I configured the top level with:
Libstdc++ was configured with:
i.e. build is preserved.
Soon as I understand what's going on with this build a little better,
I'll submit a patch for Canadian crosses; I suspect something not long
before release broke it, but the released 3.0 definitely does not build
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer