This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: snapshot version numbers?
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: snapshot version numbers?
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
- Date: 26 Jun 2001 21:15:59 +0200
- Cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010626113902.17460A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| > Easy enough:
| >
| > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pme 714743 Jun 26 14:20 libstdc++-3.0.tar.bz2
| > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pme 904281 Jun 26 14:20 libstdc++-3.0.tar.gz
| >
| > To be certain that they were 3.0 sources, I grabbed a copy of the 3.0
| > tarball from an ftp mirror, renamed the library subdirectory, and tarred
| > it up. Okay to put up on the ftp site, or is there anything that should
| > be done first?
|
| a bit out-of-date
I have a couple of questions
|
| copy your test sources into a new folder, renamed libstdc++.2.90.x
| rm -rf CVS */CVS */*/CVS
What about
cvs -z9 export -Dtoday gcc/libstdc++-v3
?
| chmod -R a+r,o-w *
| tar cvf libstdc++-2.90.5.tar libstdc++-2.90.5/
I'm lost: didn't we just agree that it should be libstdc++-3.x.y ?
-- Gaby