This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: snapshot version numbers?
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: snapshot version numbers?
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
- Date: 26 Jun 2001 19:04:49 +0200
- Cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010626095457.16975B-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| I noticed somebody started updating __GLIBCPP__ on a nightly basis. Thanks.
|
| > So, the version on the branch stays at 3.0.0, but we should change the
| > version on the trunk to 3.1 now? That works for me, but we should also
| > figure out how we're going to name snapshots that happen before the gcc
| > 3.1 release. (Did that make any sense?)
|
| Yes. I would think that both head and branch should be bumped to 3.0.1.
I would prefer libstdc++ from mainline matches mainline g++ version
(similary for branch).
|
| > I.e., ten years from now looking back, is "libstdc++-3.1.tar.gz" a copy
| > of the code that shipped with gcc-3.1, or is it one of our own snapshots
| > from the trunk?
|
| Dunno.
|
| One thing we really need to do is an official release of the library
| sources that match the gcc sources
Agreed.
-- Gaby