This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: snapshot version numbers?

To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Subject: Re: snapshot version numbers?
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
Date: 26 Jun 2001 18:59:17 +0200
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
References: <20010622150420.A17839@disaster.jaj.com> <fl1yocgs4k.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010626111018.A4649@disaster.jaj.com>

Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:

| On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:46:19PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Have it match (experiemntal) g++ version on mainline.
| 
| So, the version on the branch stays at 3.0.0, but we should change the

You shoud also make it match the branch version, e.g. 3.0.1 or
whatever. 

| version on the trunk to 3.1 now?  That works for me, but we should also
| figure out how we're going to name snapshots that happen before the gcc
| 3.1 release.  (Did that make any sense?)

What about libstdc++-3.1-20010626.tar.gz ?

-- Gaby

References:
- snapshot version numbers?
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: snapshot version numbers?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: snapshot version numbers?
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]