This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: gcc-3.0 libstdc++-2.92 can compile:

On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:25:39AM +0200, Roberto Diaz wrote:
> > > And then how is that the libstdc++ shipped with gcc-3.0 which is suppossed
> > > to be an updated version compiles without problems?  
> > Sorry, I don't understand your question.  You were complaining that when
> > you replaced the one shipped with gcc 3.0 with an older snapshot, it didn't
> > work.  It should work fine if you don't do that.
> I am not complaining.. just you say that I can not install
> libstdc++-v3-2.92 because a problem with binutils.. but I can install the
> newest version shipped with gcc-3.0 with the same binutils.. I does not
> make sense for me.. thats all.

It wasn't binutils.  Jason corrected me; it's an out-of-date libsupc++
(which comes with libstdc++).

libstdc++ 2.92 has been replaced with the version that ships with gcc 3.0.
You should not try to replace the newer code with the older code.


Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
                                     - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]