This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: gcc-3.0 libstdc++-2.92 can compile:
- To: Roberto Diaz <rdiazmartin at vivaldi dot net dot dhis dot org>
- Subject: Re: gcc-3.0 libstdc++-2.92 can compile:
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:44:39 -0400
- Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <Pine.LNX.email@example.com>
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:08:40AM +0200, Roberto Diaz wrote:
> Ok.. following your instructions I have replaced the libstdc++ which comes
> with gcc-3.0 with the latest I have downloaded (the same day I downloaded
That's probably a step backwards. The libstdc++ which comes with gcc 3.0
/is/ the latest. We haven't released a newer snapshot yet. (I haven't
had time to change a thing on our webpages yet.)
If you want the latest libstdc++-v3 which we have formally tested, just
build gcc 3.0.
Our future snapshots will probably be numbered 3.something rather than 2.92.
> /tmp/cc4O5yJM.o: In function `__FRAME_BEGIN__':
> /tmp/cc4O5yJM.o(.eh_frame+0x11): undefined reference to
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I don't remember what causes this. Wrong binutils, or something...?
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.