Re: Merge install/configopts docs into global gcc install.texi?

["David A. Greene" <greened at eecs dot umich dot edu>]

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Rainer Orth wrote:
> 
>> Are these docs really up to date for the GCC 3.0 release, and aren't they
>> better integrated into the common install.texi?
> 
> The libstdc++, as far as I understand, want to see libstdc++ also as a
> separate package that can be used by itself. In that sense having such
> separate documentation makes sense; for GCC itself, having more than
> one point to check for installation instructions is undesirable, yes.

And to bring everyone up-to-date, I am still working on
doing this.  I am attempting to compile libstdc++ with
our research compiler here.  I've had good success for the
most part, though locales are giving me a bit of trouble.
I'm about to update to the latest CVS to see if it got
fixed.  If not, I'll hopefully have a good bug report in
a couple of days.

I've been out of town and not been able to keep up with the
list as of late, but I wanted to let you all know that I'm
still working on making libstdc++ a separately-buildable
package!

-Dave