This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: PR3042
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, "dje at watson dot ibm dot com" <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, "Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr" <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>, "jason at cygnus dot com" <jason at cygnus dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
> > Seconded. The more I hear about the quirks of AIX linking semantics
Yup. As much as I hate to keep this thread alive, I think the KDE and Qt
arugments advanced by David for keeping the same semantics as gcc.2.95.x
(which, IMHO, are broken) are a bit of a red herring: yes, these programs
are written in c++, but they don't really use the kinds of data
structures that have the difficulty.
That being said, at this point, now that most things are working, I'd
hate to see a significant linkage change at the last minute.