Re: correct "C" headers, higher priority

[Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>]

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 09:25:17PM -0400, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> I feel better when I check other implemetations of the C++ standard library.
> With a few notable proprietary exceptions (eg. Solaris 8), nobody else has
> bothered making their <c...> headers compliant.  Perhaps it's just too hard?

I think the proprietary folks are thinking more along the lines of, "We have
to concentrate on the stuff that gets used a lot.  We don't have to make
<c...> a priority because only fifty people on the entire planet have heard
of them /and use them/... and they're all libstdc++ hackers anyway." :-)


Phil

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.