This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: complex config cruft?
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: complex config cruft?
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
- Date: 30 May 2001 11:06:13 +0200
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
- References: <200105300058.f4U0wWl17006@fillmore.constant.com>
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| _GLIBCPP_BUGGY_FLOAT_COMPLEX
| _GLIBCPP_BUGGY_COMPLEX
|
| Does anyone know if these bits are still necessary? I'm thinking no:
I think the problem was solved.
| gcc-2.95.2 had some problems (ok a lot of problems) with the whole
| complex thing, especially on alpha. That's now a thing of the past,
| and I'm thinking these bits are too. Since 2.95 compatibility has been
| completely thrown out the window at this point, I see no reason to
| keep these bits.
|
| Any objections to nuking them? Speak now........
Feel free to remove them if noone else complains.
-- Gaby