Re: 26_numerics/fabs_inline.cc

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>]

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

| This appears to be a brand-new test which fails due to the changes to
| the handling of builtins.  The compiler issues a (seemingly correct)
| error on the using directive that puts multiple declarations of `fabs'
| with the same type in the same scope.  I think the
|  
|   #define fabs __glibcpp_fabs
| 
| stuff is necessary in std_cmath.h too, with the changes that we just
| made to the builtins.
| 
| This is easy to do, but I don't have time before I turn into a
| pumpkin.  Would one of you take care of it?  Or, if you like, just
| XFAIL the test on the branch?  We're just banging our heads on the
| same issue over and over here with the global/std namespace clashes.

The purpose of this testcase is trickier.  But I'll just xfail it on
branch.  Is that OK?

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com