This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: checkin clarification

To: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
Subject: Re: checkin clarification
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 02:41:43 -0400
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200105180542.f4I5g1020271@fillmore.constant.com> <fllmnv19hw.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>

On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 08:01:15AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> | Hey folks, I think we should try to keep trunk and branch in lockstep
> | right now. Is this the plan? 
> 
> OK.

Sounds good for bugfixes, non-code things like documentation and comments, etc.

What do you want to do with experimental stuff?  Trunk only, or wait a few
weeks until after the release before checking it in and change the branch
at the same time (lockstep), or...?

Phil

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: checkin clarification
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- checkin clarification
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: checkin clarification
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]