This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Question about allocator design
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: Question about allocator design
- From: "Richard B. Kreckel" <kreckel at ginac dot de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:05:37 +0200 (CEST)
- cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Reply-To: Richard dot Kreckel at Uni-Mainz dot DE
Hi all,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, I wrote:
[...]
> Well, I was referring to the branch. And reading stl_alloc.h also
> suggests thread-safety is a reason. I tried that library again and well,
> I still see some cases where memory consumption goes way up and stays
> where it is, even with libstdc++-v3! It does not appear to be a memleak
> since repeating that call hundreds of times does not eat more memory. I
> have, however, not found out (yet) wich template instantiations are
> responsible for that. Are you definitely sure the behaviour has changed
> all over STL or may some containers still be doing the old allocation?!?
Okay, here is relief: After more debugging I found some intersting
interference causing a memory leak and GCC's new libstdc++ is not at all
to blame. Thought I should post this here after having hollered. Sorry.
Regards
-richy.
PS: On the recent topic of doxygen/dot usage: Go, go go! It greatly helps
programmers new to a project to understand the interconnections
between files / data structures. The only problem I keep struggling
with could be a problem for libstdc++, too. It is item 4 on the
wishlist at <http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/todo.html>.
--
Richard Kreckel
<Richard.Kreckel@GiNaC.DE>
<http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>