libstdc++ archive
date index for April, 2001

This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2001
23:35 Re: Problems with <limit> and nans Gabriel Dos Reis
16:00 Problems with <limit> and nans Peter Schmid
12:09 Re: [libstdc++]: Proposed patch for libstdc++/2694 Benjamin Kosnik
11:28 Problem with your patch Peter Schmid
10:51 [libstdc++]: Proposed patch for libstdc++/2694 Peter Schmid
08:22 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch Benjamin Kosnik

April 28, 2001
18:43 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch Phil Edwards
17:29 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch Phil Edwards

April 27, 2001
16:57 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch Benjamin Kosnik
15:57 Re: 3.[01] bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu in Brad Lucier
15:49 Re: 3.[01] bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu incompex_io.cc Mark Mitchell
13:15 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch Phil Edwards
11:07 3.[01] bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu in compex_io.cc Brad Lucier
09:07 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite Robert Lipe
06:39 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite Gabriel Dos Reis
05:17 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite Nathan Sidwell
02:50 ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite Zack Weinberg
00:28 doxygen + char_traits, output Benjamin Kosnik
00:23 doxygen + char_traits, patch Benjamin Kosnik

April 26, 2001
18:32 Re: std::basic_stringbuf problems Benjamin Kosnik
14:25 std::basic_stringbuf problems Bryan Rittmeyer
12:09 Re: Strange warning while building the current libstdc++ library Benjamin Kosnik
12:08 Re: Problems with 22_locale/ctor_copy_dtor.cc Benjamin Kosnik
12:07 Re: Doxygen comments in code Benjamin Kosnik
03:15 Re: Doxygen comments in code Nathan Myers

April 25, 2001
17:12 Re: Doxygen comments in code Benjamin Kosnik
16:24 Re: Doxygen comments in code Richard Andrews
14:47 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information fromGCC Mark Mitchell
14:33 Re: Boost's call_traits_test.cpp Paolo Carlini
13:30 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC Alexandre Oliva
11:31 Re: libstdc++-v3 std::string performance Benjamin Kosnik
11:18 Re: Boost's call_traits_test.cpp Paolo Carlini
10:33 Re: Boost's call_traits_test.cpp Peter Schmid
09:29 Boost's call_traits_test.cpp Paolo Carlini
08:58 Re: c_std/ and throw() Jason Merrill
07:11 RE: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Rob Taylor
05:54 Re: suggested --enable-concept-checks Phil Edwards
05:39 Doxygen comments in code Phil Edwards
04:33 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Gabriel Dos Reis
02:20 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Phil Edwards
02:12 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Phil Edwards
00:10 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Gabriel Dos Reis

April 24, 2001
23:14 Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Richard Andrews
19:06 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Benjamin Kosnik
18:54 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Phil Edwards
18:47 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC Tom Tromey
18:36 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC Loren James Rittle
17:27 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on makecheck Benjamin Kosnik
17:21 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Ulrich Drepper
17:09 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on makecheck Benjamin Kosnik
16:43 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Jason Merrill
16:21 Problems with 22_locale/ctor_copy_dtor.cc Peter Schmid
16:09 Strange warning while building the current libstdc++ library Peter Schmid
15:25 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC Tom Tromey
13:23 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC Loren James Rittle
12:20 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Gabriel Dos Reis
10:08 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC Tom Tromey
09:46 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Benjamin Kosnik
09:43 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC Benjamin Kosnik
09:37 Re: c_std/ and throw() Benjamin Kosnik
07:29 Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC Alexandre Oliva
06:27 Re: c_std/ and throw() Jason Merrill
06:05 Re: Question about allocator design Richard B. Kreckel

April 23, 2001
21:45 gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check Gordon Sadler
16:17 Re: [libstc++] Problems with ext/slist (patch included) Benjamin Kosnik
15:09 [libstc++] Problems with ext/slist (patch included) Peter Schmid
13:12 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Loren James Rittle
03:16 thank you yxr72

April 22, 2001
16:04 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Richard Andrews
04:42 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Phil Edwards
04:15 Re: 21_strings/insert.cc on the mainline Phil Edwards

April 21, 2001
20:18 reply yxr72

April 20, 2001
23:29 Re: c_std/ and throw() Jakub Jelinek
19:18 suggested --enable-concept-checks Phil Edwards
16:55 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Gabriel Dos Reis
16:09 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Benjamin Kosnik
15:57 Re: c_std/ and throw() Benjamin Kosnik
13:19 [v3,trunk] Replace old macro Phil Edwards
10:54 RE: breaking compatibility Stephen M. Webb
10:00 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support Gabriel Dos Reis
09:54 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support Benjamin Kosnik
08:34 Re: 100's of FAILs in g++ testsuite under hpux 10.20 John David Anglin
03:50 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support Gabriel Dos Reis
03:16 for help yxr72
01:35 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support Benjamin Kosnik
01:15 3 PR to close Benoit Sibaud
01:03 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support Gabriel Dos Reis

April 19, 2001
23:33 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Michael Elizabeth Chastain
19:24 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors Benjamin Kosnik
19:20 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors Phil Edwards
18:59 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors Benjamin Kosnik
18:45 [v3] long long, c99 support Benjamin Kosnik
18:27 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors Phil Edwards
18:16 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Phil Edwards
17:57 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Benjamin Kosnik
17:54 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
17:49 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Sam TH
17:43 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Joe Buck
17:30 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Benjamin Kosnik
16:58 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors Benjamin Kosnik
16:04 [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting Phil Edwards
15:41 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
15:01 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors Phil Edwards
14:42 RE: breaking compatibility Loren Osborn
14:23 Re: breaking compatibility Phil Edwards
13:52 RE: breaking compatibility Benjamin Kosnik
13:39 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
13:34 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Mark Mitchell
13:33 Re: breaking compatibility Nathan Myers
13:32 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
13:27 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report Michael Elizabeth Chastain
13:07 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report John David Anglin
13:07 RE: breaking compatibility Loren Osborn
12:57 RE: libstdc++-v3 vs gcc-2.95.3 Stephen M. Webb
12:56 RE: breaking compatibility Stephen M. Webb
12:25 RE: breaking compatibility Loren Osborn
11:35 RE: breaking compatibility Benjamin Kosnik
11:25 RE: breaking compatibility Loren Osborn
09:03 RE: libstdc++-v3 vs gcc-2.95.3 Kevin Williams
01:29 question yxr72
01:22 question yxr72
00:42 Re: "unable to detect exception model" Paolo Carlini

April 18, 2001
17:16 example of killer doxygen formatting Benjamin Kosnik
14:59 RE: "unable to detect exception model" Yasir
11:46 libstdc++-v3 vs gcc-2.95.3 Jack Reeves
11:28 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..." Phil Edwards
11:23 Re: "unable to detect exception model" Phil Edwards
11:20 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..." Paolo Carlini
11:15 Re: "unable to detect exception model" Paolo Carlini
11:09 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..." Phil Edwards
11:08 Re: "unable to detect exception model" Phil Edwards
10:59 Re: "unable to detect exception model" Paolo Carlini
10:57 Re: "unable to detect exception model" Benjamin Kosnik
10:51 Re: "unable to detect exception model" Paolo Carlini
10:51 Re: Analysis of 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc (execution test) failure Benjamin Kosnik
10:24 Re: "unable to detect exception model" Benjamin Kosnik
10:23 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..." Paolo Carlini
10:19 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..." Benjamin Kosnik
09:37 "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..." Phil Edwards
07:33 Re: "unable to detect exception model" Paolo Carlini
07:28 RE: "unable to detect exception model" Stephen M. Webb
06:44 "unable to detect exception model" Paolo Carlini
03:31 Re: Support for RUNTESTFLAGS in DejaGnu test harness for libstdc++-v3? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:18 Re: Analysis of 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc (execution test) failure Loren James Rittle
02:07 Support for RUNTESTFLAGS in DejaGnu test harness for libstdc++-v3? Loren James Rittle
01:43 Analysis of 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc (execution test) failure Loren James Rittle

April 17, 2001
22:13 PATCH: 27_io/istream_seeks.cc failure Loren James Rittle
19:03 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong Joe Buck
17:41 Re: Thanks to you for your work! (was: Re: Boost regression testsuite results for...) Paolo Carlini
17:38 help,about Qt atom
16:48 Re: [v3,trunk] disable a concept check for std::transform Phil Edwards
16:40 Re: [v3,trunk] disable a concept check for std::transform Gabriel Dos Reis
16:33 Re: Thanks to you for your work! (was: Re: Boost regression testsuite results for...) Phil Edwards
16:17 [v3,trunk] disable a concept check for std::transform Phil Edwards
16:16 Re: Thanks to you for your work! (was: Re: Boost regression testsuite results for...) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:56 Thanks to you for your work! (was: Re: Boost regression testsuite results for...) Paolo Carlini
14:30 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checkingcode Benjamin Kosnik
14:24 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong Benjamin Kosnik
14:11 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong Paul J. Lucas
11:31 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong Benjamin Kosnik
11:26 Re: Question about allocator design Richard B. Kreckel
11:26 Re: libstdc++-v3 build failure Benjamin Kosnik
11:22 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong Paul J. Lucas
11:20 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong Benjamin Kosnik
08:24 __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong Paul J. Lucas
08:24 libstdc++-v3 build failure Robert Lipe
05:27 bits/stl_algobase.h Ryszard Kabatek

April 16, 2001
15:49 Re: 21_strings/insert.cc on the mainline Peter Schmid
13:53 Re: 21_strings/insert.cc on the mainline Phil Edwards
13:32 21_strings/insert.cc on the mainline Phil Edwards
10:37 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checkingcode Paolo Carlini
09:32 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checkingcode Peter Schmid
09:05 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code Paolo Carlini
08:11 Re: Question about allocator design Phil Edwards
07:41 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code Gabriel Dos Reis
06:21 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code Paolo Carlini
06:15 Question about allocator design Richard B. Kreckel
03:43 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code Paolo Carlini

April 15, 2001
17:52 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code Phil Edwards
17:29 V3 PATCH: Disable concept-checking Mark Mitchell
15:05 Re: cin (still) not working (for me) Paolo Carlini
14:46 Re: cin (still) not working (for me) Phil Edwards
14:27 Re: Concept-checking code on branch Phil Edwards
11:48 Re: 100's of FAILs in g++ testsuite under hpux 10.20 John David Anglin
10:04 Re: Concept-checking code on branch Mark Mitchell
02:26 Re: cin (still) not working (for me) Paolo Carlini

April 14, 2001
18:44 Re: cin (still) not working (for me) Phil Edwards
18:37 Re: Concept-checking code on branch Phil Edwards
02:15 Re: Concept-checking code on branch Gabriel Dos Reis
00:34 Concept-checking code on branch Mark Mitchell

April 13, 2001
15:09 Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checkingcode Peter Schmid
08:15 cin (still) not working (for me) Paolo Carlini
05:15 static initialization woes Timothy Wall
02:34 [v3] std::equal using wrong concept check Phil Edwards
02:02 [v3] uglify concept-checking code Phil Edwards

April 12, 2001
23:53 Re: [libstdc++] New implementation of concept checking Phil Edwards
19:50 Re: libstdc++ execute tests Gabriel Dos Reis
17:54 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3 Joe Buck
09:42 Re: gcc 3.0 branch fails on libstdc++ Matt_Conway
09:05 Re: gcc 3.0 branch fails on libstdc++ Benjamin Kosnik
07:53 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3 Benjamin Kosnik
07:08 gcc 3.0 branch fails on libstdc++ Matthew Conway
06:36 Re: Patch to libstdc++.exp Jason Merrill
06:22 Re: Patch to libstdc++.exp Gabriel Dos Reis
06:05 Re: Patch to libstdc++.exp Jason Merrill
05:38 Patch to libstdc++.exp Jason Merrill
00:40 Re: c_std/ and throw() Jason Merrill
00:39 Re: c_std/ and throw() Artem Khodush

April 11, 2001
23:02 Re: libstdc++ test results for 3.1 20010410 (experimental) on i686-p c-cygwin Benjamin Kosnik
21:19 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3 Benjamin Scherrey
21:05 libstdc++ test results for 3.1 20010410 (experimental) on i686-pc-cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:52 V3 PATCH: Document dg.exp interface Gabriel Dos Reis
10:36 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards
10:17 Re: c_std/ and throw() Benjamin Kosnik
10:07 Re: doxygen redux Benjamin Kosnik
09:44 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3 Joe Buck
09:35 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3 Phil Edwards
08:39 Re: c_std/ and throw() Jakub Jelinek
08:26 libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3 Kevin Williams
07:38 Re: c_std/ and throw() Artem Khodush
07:16 Re: doxygen redux Rich Churcher
05:47 c_std/ and throw() Jakub Jelinek

April 10, 2001
18:04 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Nathan Myers
17:58 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Nathan Myers
11:11 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:11 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards
09:49 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Gabriel Dos Reis
09:32 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards

April 09, 2001
23:09 Re: Apply std errno patch of 2001-03-06 to 3.0 branch? Benjamin Kosnik
15:52 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:13 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards
14:48 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:36 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards
14:11 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot Phil Edwards
10:39 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Joe Buck
01:38 cin not working Yasir

April 08, 2001
22:37 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Nathan Myers
10:45 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Gabriel Dos Reis
10:42 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Gabriel Dos Reis

April 07, 2001
20:35 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Benjamin Kosnik
16:58 Apply std errno patch of 2001-03-06 to 3.0 branch? Mumit Khan
12:32 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Joe Buck
10:23 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Peter Schmid
03:25 cpplib: Honour #warning in system headers Neil Booth
03:09 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Jason Merrill
03:01 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Nathan Myers
02:42 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Nathan Myers
01:45 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Nathan Myers

April 06, 2001
17:49 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Loren James Rittle
16:47 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Gabriel Dos Reis
16:06 Re: quiet please [no checkins] Benjamin Kosnik
16:00 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Loren James Rittle
15:43 Announcing libstdc++-2.92 Benjamin Kosnik
15:31 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Richard Henderson
15:23 quiet please [no checkins] Benjamin Kosnik
14:41 Re: [libstdc++ patch] Fix to std::equal and bug c++/2406 Gabriel Dos Reis
14:32 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Mark Mitchell
14:23 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Richard Henderson
14:19 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:17 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot Phil Edwards
14:04 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Benjamin Kosnik
14:02 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot Benjamin Kosnik
13:25 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards
12:56 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Mark Mitchell
12:34 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Theodore Papadopoulo
12:28 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot Phil Edwards
12:25 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards
12:18 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot Benjamin Kosnik
12:16 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Gabriel Dos Reis
12:15 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Benjamin Kosnik
12:10 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot Craig Rodrigues
12:09 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Peter Schmid
11:54 [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot Phil Edwards
11:32 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Phil Edwards
11:27 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards
11:26 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:21 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards
11:12 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Phil Edwards
11:06 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Gabriel Dos Reis
11:00 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Gabriel Dos Reis
10:58 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Gabriel Dos Reis
10:55 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Joe Buck
10:41 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Theodore Papadopoulo
10:37 PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998 Loren James Rittle
10:04 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Gabriel Dos Reis
09:54 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Benjamin Kosnik
09:46 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Joe Buck
09:31 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Gabriel Dos Reis
09:16 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Joe Buck
08:59 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Mark Mitchell
07:10 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Gabriel Dos Reis
06:52 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Gabriel Dos Reis
06:30 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Jason Merrill
06:27 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Jan Hubicka
06:18 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Jan Hubicka
06:17 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Jan Hubicka
06:09 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Jason Merrill

April 05, 2001
23:24 Re: backward -> deprecated Benjamin Kosnik
22:54 Re: backward -> deprecated Neil Booth
22:40 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Gabriel Dos Reis
22:29 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Nathan Myers
22:24 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Gabriel Dos Reis
22:15 Re: backward -> deprecated Benjamin Kosnik
22:10 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Benjamin Kosnik
22:01 Re: backward -> deprecated Neil Booth
21:33 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Gabriel Dos Reis
21:31 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Gabriel Dos Reis
19:53 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Ulrich Drepper
19:40 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Benjamin Kosnik
19:27 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Gabriel Dos Reis
19:24 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Gabriel Dos Reis
19:17 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Ulrich Drepper
19:08 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Mark Mitchell
19:02 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Benjamin Kosnik
18:59 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Benjamin Kosnik
18:58 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Mark Mitchell
18:52 V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath> Gabriel Dos Reis
18:18 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Benjamin Kosnik
17:57 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:56 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:32 Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Mark Mitchell
16:50 Re: [libstdc++] New implementation of concept checking Jason Merrill
16:47 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Benjamin Kosnik
16:43 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Peter Schmid
16:12 Re: backward -> deprecated Benjamin Kosnik
16:07 Re: Compiling w/o gcc? Jason Merrill
14:12 [v3] find doxygen in user's PATH Phil Edwards
11:42 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Phil Edwards
10:20 Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost) Peter Schmid
10:07 Re: [v3] doxygen tweaks Phil Edwards
08:45 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Phil Edwards
08:36 Re: Compiling w/o gcc? David A. Greene
00:28 Problems with gcc/libstdc++ on Solaris 8 Travis Shirk

April 04, 2001
21:32 Re: [v3] doxygen tweaks Benjamin Kosnik
19:45 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Gabriel Dos Reis
19:02 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Benjamin Kosnik
17:44 new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI Joe Buck
16:10 Re: [v3] doxygen tweaks Benjamin Kosnik
16:03 Problems with gcc/libstdc++ on Solaris 8 Travis Shirk
15:21 [v3] doxygen tweaks Phil Edwards
14:38 Re: [libstdc++] Proposed patch for fstream.h Benjamin Kosnik
13:20 Re: Compiling w/o gcc? Phil Edwards
12:02 Strange contents of installed libstdc++.la? Franz Sirl
10:09 Re: [libstdc++] Proposed patch for fstream.h Peter Schmid

April 03, 2001
23:23 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
17:11 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
16:06 Shared libstd++ link failure on 3.0 0402 on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 RDBrown
15:11 Re: rel_ops issues Benjamin Kosnik
14:53 Re: [v3] slight bugfix for tests_flags.in Gabriel Dos Reis
14:38 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
14:27 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
14:26 Re: Compiling w/o gcc? David A. Greene
14:13 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
14:08 Re: Compiling w/o gcc? Benjamin Kosnik
13:57 Re: [libstdc++] Patch for include/bits/stl_iterator_base_types.h Benjamin Kosnik
13:38 Re: [libstdc++] Patch for include/bits/stl_iterator_base_types.h Phil Edwards
13:28 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
13:09 Re: Compiling w/o gcc? David A. Greene
13:07 Re: [v3] slight bugfix for tests_flags.in Phil Edwards
13:00 Re: Compiling w/o gcc? Phil Edwards
12:47 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
12:17 [libstdc++] Patch for include/bits/stl_iterator_base_types.h Peter Schmid
12:14 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
11:28 RE: limitations with gcov and STL Greg Bumgardner
07:39 RE: debugging programs that use stl containers Craveiro, Marco
07:21 Re: mar-2001 libstdc++ outstanding Gabriel Dos Reis
07:15 unwanted C9X bits: isnan() et al. Gabriel Dos Reis
02:09 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Ross Smith
01:57 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Ross Smith
00:36 limitations with gcov and STL Michelle Lorenz

April 02, 2001
23:49 testsuite additional fails Benjamin Kosnik
23:31 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
23:03 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:02 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:52 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:51 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:04 Re: Some remarks running the testsuite Alexandre Oliva
21:17 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Steven King
19:13 Re: rel_ops issues Mark Mitchell
19:11 Re: rel_ops issues Mark Mitchell
18:54 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Ross Smith
18:48 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Benjamin Kosnik
18:26 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
18:24 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Steven King
18:19 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
17:34 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:31 [libstdc++] New implementation of concept checking Phil Edwards
17:26 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Benjamin Kosnik
17:22 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement Gabriel Dos Reis
17:19 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:15 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement Benjamin Kosnik
17:04 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
17:02 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement Zack Weinberg
17:01 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Steven King
16:47 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement Gabriel Dos Reis
16:35 Re: Some remarks running the testsuite Gabriel Dos Reis
16:31 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement Zack Weinberg
16:19 Re: debugging programs that use stl containers Daniel Berlin
16:16 Re: Some remarks running the testsuite Benjamin Kosnik
15:49 limitations with gcov and STL Lorenz, Michelle
15:45 Re: how are xfails supposed to work? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:33 Re: Can't I build the libstdc++-v3 on HP-UX? Benjamin Kosnik
15:30 how are xfails supposed to work? Benjamin Kosnik
15:25 Re: debugging programs that use stl containers Benjamin Kosnik
15:23 Re: rel_ops issues Benjamin Kosnik
15:17 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:13 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Benjamin Kosnik
15:08 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement Gabriel Dos Reis
14:59 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement Benjamin Kosnik
14:36 libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement Zack Weinberg
14:16 Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)? Jeffrey Oldham
14:08 Some remarks running the testsuite Peter Schmid
13:08 Re: monthly summaries Gabriel Dos Reis
13:03 mar-2001 libstdc++ outstanding Benjamin Kosnik
12:36 monthly summaries Benjamin Kosnik
12:32 mar-2001 gcc-bugs outstanding Benjamin Kosnik
10:44 Re: <fstream.h> and filebuf Gabriel Dos Reis
09:31 <fstream.h> and filebuf Andreas Schwab
06:31 Re: Compiling w/o gcc? David A. Greene
00:51 debugging programs that use stl containers Craveiro, Marco

April 01, 2001
23:20 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
22:11 Infrastructure for testing V3 Gabriel Dos Reis
21:53 Re: Severe problems running the libstdc++ testsuite Gabriel Dos Reis
21:49 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
21:49 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
21:34 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
17:36 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
17:02 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
16:49 Re: rel_ops issues Joe Buck
16:15 Severe problems running the libstdc++ testsuite Peter Schmid
12:19 Remove bashism from libstdc++-v3/tests_flags.in Zack Weinberg
07:09 Re: backward -> deprecated Neil Booth
06:24 Re: [v3] slight bugfix for tests_flags.in Gabriel Dos Reis
06:07 Re: backward -> deprecated Gabriel Dos Reis
06:00 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
05:55 Re: rel_ops issues Gabriel Dos Reis
00:25 Failure running testsuite Andreas Jaeger


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.7