libstdc++ archive
author index for April, 2001

This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Alexandre Oliva

2001-04-02 22:04 Re: Some remarks running the testsuite
2001-04-24 07:29 Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC
2001-04-25 13:30 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC

Andreas Jaeger

2001-04-01 00:25 Failure running testsuite

Andreas Schwab

2001-04-02 09:31 <fstream.h> and filebuf

Artem Khodush

2001-04-11 07:38 Re: c_std/ and throw()
2001-04-12 00:39 Re: c_std/ and throw()

atom

2001-04-17 17:38 help,about Qt

Benjamin Kosnik

2001-04-02 12:32 mar-2001 gcc-bugs outstanding
2001-04-02 12:36 monthly summaries
2001-04-02 13:03 mar-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
2001-04-02 14:59 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement
2001-04-02 15:13 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 15:23 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-02 15:25 Re: debugging programs that use stl containers
2001-04-02 15:30 how are xfails supposed to work?
2001-04-02 15:33 Re: Can't I build the libstdc++-v3 on HP-UX?
2001-04-02 16:16 Re: Some remarks running the testsuite
2001-04-02 17:15 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement
2001-04-02 17:26 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 18:48 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 23:49 testsuite additional fails
2001-04-03 13:57 Re: [libstdc++] Patch for include/bits/stl_iterator_base_types.h
2001-04-03 14:08 Re: Compiling w/o gcc?
2001-04-03 15:11 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-04 14:38 Re: [libstdc++] Proposed patch for fstream.h
2001-04-04 16:10 Re: [v3] doxygen tweaks
2001-04-04 19:02 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-04 21:32 Re: [v3] doxygen tweaks
2001-04-05 16:12 Re: backward -> deprecated
2001-04-05 16:47 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-05 18:18 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-05 18:59 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 19:02 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-05 19:40 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 22:10 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 22:15 Re: backward -> deprecated
2001-04-05 23:24 Re: backward -> deprecated
2001-04-06 09:54 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 12:15 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-06 12:18 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot
2001-04-06 14:02 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot
2001-04-06 14:04 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-06 15:23 quiet please [no checkins]
2001-04-06 15:43 Announcing libstdc++-2.92
2001-04-06 16:06 Re: quiet please [no checkins]
2001-04-07 20:35 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-09 23:09 Re: Apply std errno patch of 2001-03-06 to 3.0 branch?
2001-04-11 10:07 Re: doxygen redux
2001-04-11 10:17 Re: c_std/ and throw()
2001-04-11 23:02 Re: libstdc++ test results for 3.1 20010410 (experimental) on i686-p c-cygwin
2001-04-12 07:53 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3
2001-04-12 09:05 Re: gcc 3.0 branch fails on libstdc++
2001-04-17 11:20 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong
2001-04-17 11:26 Re: libstdc++-v3 build failure
2001-04-17 11:31 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong
2001-04-17 14:24 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong
2001-04-17 14:30 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checkingcode
2001-04-18 10:19 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..."
2001-04-18 10:24 Re: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-18 10:51 Re: Analysis of 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc (execution test) failure
2001-04-18 10:57 Re: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-18 17:16 example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-19 11:35 RE: breaking compatibility
2001-04-19 13:52 RE: breaking compatibility
2001-04-19 16:58 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors
2001-04-19 17:30 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
2001-04-19 17:57 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-19 18:45 [v3] long long, c99 support
2001-04-19 18:59 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors
2001-04-19 19:24 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors
2001-04-20 01:35 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support
2001-04-20 09:54 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support
2001-04-20 15:57 Re: c_std/ and throw()
2001-04-20 16:09 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-23 16:17 Re: [libstc++] Problems with ext/slist (patch included)
2001-04-24 09:37 Re: c_std/ and throw()
2001-04-24 09:43 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC
2001-04-24 09:46 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check
2001-04-24 17:09 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on makecheck
2001-04-24 17:27 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on makecheck
2001-04-24 19:06 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-25 11:31 Re: libstdc++-v3 std::string performance
2001-04-25 17:12 Re: Doxygen comments in code
2001-04-26 12:07 Re: Doxygen comments in code
2001-04-26 12:08 Re: Problems with 22_locale/ctor_copy_dtor.cc
2001-04-26 12:09 Re: Strange warning while building the current libstdc++ library
2001-04-26 18:32 Re: std::basic_stringbuf problems
2001-04-27 00:23 doxygen + char_traits, patch
2001-04-27 00:28 doxygen + char_traits, output
2001-04-27 16:57 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch
2001-04-30 08:22 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch
2001-04-30 12:09 Re: [libstdc++]: Proposed patch for libstdc++/2694

Benjamin Scherrey

2001-04-11 21:19 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3

Benoit Sibaud

2001-04-20 01:15 3 PR to close

Billinghurst, David (CRTS)

2001-04-11 21:05 libstdc++ test results for 3.1 20010410 (experimental) on i686-pc-cygwin

Brad Lucier

2001-04-27 11:07 3.[01] bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu in compex_io.cc
2001-04-27 15:57 Re: 3.[01] bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu in

Bryan Rittmeyer

2001-04-26 14:25 std::basic_stringbuf problems

Craig Rodrigues

2001-04-06 12:10 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot

Craveiro, Marco

2001-04-02 00:51 debugging programs that use stl containers
2001-04-03 07:39 RE: debugging programs that use stl containers

Daniel Berlin

2001-04-02 16:19 Re: debugging programs that use stl containers

David A. Greene

2001-04-02 06:31 Re: Compiling w/o gcc?
2001-04-03 13:09 Re: Compiling w/o gcc?
2001-04-03 14:26 Re: Compiling w/o gcc?
2001-04-05 08:36 Re: Compiling w/o gcc?

Franz Sirl

2001-04-04 12:02 Strange contents of installed libstdc++.la?

Gabriel Dos Reis

2001-04-01 05:55 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-01 06:00 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-01 06:07 Re: backward -> deprecated
2001-04-01 06:24 Re: [v3] slight bugfix for tests_flags.in
2001-04-01 21:34 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-01 21:49 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-01 21:49 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-01 21:53 Re: Severe problems running the libstdc++ testsuite
2001-04-01 22:11 Infrastructure for testing V3
2001-04-02 10:44 Re: <fstream.h> and filebuf
2001-04-02 13:08 Re: monthly summaries
2001-04-02 15:08 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement
2001-04-02 15:17 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 15:45 Re: how are xfails supposed to work?
2001-04-02 16:35 Re: Some remarks running the testsuite
2001-04-02 16:47 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement
2001-04-02 17:19 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 17:22 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement
2001-04-02 17:34 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 18:19 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-02 22:51 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 22:52 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 23:02 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 23:03 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 23:31 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-03 07:15 unwanted C9X bits: isnan() et al.
2001-04-03 07:21 Re: mar-2001 libstdc++ outstanding
2001-04-03 12:47 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-03 14:13 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-03 14:38 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-03 14:53 Re: [v3] slight bugfix for tests_flags.in
2001-04-03 23:23 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-04 19:45 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-05 17:56 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-05 17:57 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-05 18:52 V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 19:24 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 19:27 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 21:31 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 21:33 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 22:24 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 22:40 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-06 06:52 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 07:10 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-06 09:31 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 10:04 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 10:58 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 11:00 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 11:06 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-06 11:26 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-06 12:16 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-06 14:19 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-06 14:41 Re: [libstdc++ patch] Fix to std::equal and bug c++/2406
2001-04-06 16:47 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-08 10:42 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-08 10:45 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-09 14:48 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-09 15:52 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-10 09:49 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-10 11:11 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-11 16:52 V3 PATCH: Document dg.exp interface
2001-04-12 06:22 Re: Patch to libstdc++.exp
2001-04-12 19:50 Re: libstdc++ execute tests
2001-04-14 02:15 Re: Concept-checking code on branch
2001-04-16 07:41 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code
2001-04-17 16:16 Re: Thanks to you for your work! (was: Re: Boost regression testsuite results for...)
2001-04-17 16:40 Re: [v3,trunk] disable a concept check for std::transform
2001-04-18 03:31 Re: Support for RUNTESTFLAGS in DejaGnu test harness for libstdc++-v3?
2001-04-20 01:03 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support
2001-04-20 03:50 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support
2001-04-20 10:00 Re: [v3] long long, c99 support
2001-04-20 16:55 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-24 12:20 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check
2001-04-25 00:10 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check
2001-04-25 04:33 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-27 06:39 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite
2001-04-30 23:35 Re: Problems with <limit> and nans

Gordon Sadler

2001-04-23 21:45 gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check

Greg Bumgardner

2001-04-03 11:28 RE: limitations with gcov and STL

Jack Reeves

2001-04-18 11:46 libstdc++-v3 vs gcc-2.95.3

Jakub Jelinek

2001-04-11 05:47 c_std/ and throw()
2001-04-11 08:39 Re: c_std/ and throw()
2001-04-20 23:29 Re: c_std/ and throw()

Jan Hubicka

2001-04-06 06:17 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-06 06:18 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-06 06:27 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Jason Merrill

2001-04-05 16:07 Re: Compiling w/o gcc?
2001-04-05 16:50 Re: [libstdc++] New implementation of concept checking
2001-04-06 06:09 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 06:30 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-07 03:09 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-12 00:40 Re: c_std/ and throw()
2001-04-12 05:38 Patch to libstdc++.exp
2001-04-12 06:05 Re: Patch to libstdc++.exp
2001-04-12 06:36 Re: Patch to libstdc++.exp
2001-04-24 06:27 Re: c_std/ and throw()
2001-04-24 16:43 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check
2001-04-25 08:58 Re: c_std/ and throw()

Jeffrey Oldham

2001-04-02 14:16 Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?

Joe Buck

2001-04-01 16:49 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-01 17:02 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-01 17:36 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-01 23:20 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-02 17:04 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-02 18:26 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-03 12:14 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-03 13:28 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-03 14:27 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-03 17:11 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-04 17:44 new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 09:16 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 09:46 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 10:55 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-07 12:32 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-09 10:39 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-11 09:44 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3
2001-04-12 17:54 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3
2001-04-17 19:03 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong
2001-04-19 17:43 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report

John David Anglin

2001-04-15 11:48 Re: 100's of FAILs in g++ testsuite under hpux 10.20
2001-04-19 13:07 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
2001-04-19 13:32 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
2001-04-19 13:39 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
2001-04-20 08:34 Re: 100's of FAILs in g++ testsuite under hpux 10.20

Kevin Williams

2001-04-11 08:26 libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3
2001-04-19 09:03 RE: libstdc++-v3 vs gcc-2.95.3

Loren James Rittle

2001-04-06 10:37 PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-06 16:00 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-06 17:49 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-17 22:13 PATCH: 27_io/istream_seeks.cc failure
2001-04-18 01:43 Analysis of 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc (execution test) failure
2001-04-18 02:07 Support for RUNTESTFLAGS in DejaGnu test harness for libstdc++-v3?
2001-04-18 02:18 Re: Analysis of 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc (execution test) failure
2001-04-23 13:12 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-24 13:23 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC
2001-04-24 18:36 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC

Loren Osborn

2001-04-19 11:25 RE: breaking compatibility
2001-04-19 12:25 RE: breaking compatibility
2001-04-19 13:07 RE: breaking compatibility
2001-04-19 14:42 RE: breaking compatibility

Lorenz, Michelle

2001-04-02 15:49 limitations with gcov and STL

Mark Mitchell

2001-04-02 19:11 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-02 19:13 Re: rel_ops issues
2001-04-05 17:32 Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-05 18:58 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-05 19:08 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-06 08:59 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-06 12:56 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 14:32 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-14 00:34 Concept-checking code on branch
2001-04-15 10:04 Re: Concept-checking code on branch
2001-04-15 17:29 V3 PATCH: Disable concept-checking
2001-04-19 13:34 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
2001-04-19 15:41 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
2001-04-19 17:54 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
2001-04-25 14:47 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information fromGCC
2001-04-27 15:49 Re: 3.[01] bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu incompex_io.cc

Matt_Conway

2001-04-12 09:42 Re: gcc 3.0 branch fails on libstdc++

Matthew Conway

2001-04-12 07:08 gcc 3.0 branch fails on libstdc++

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

2001-04-19 13:27 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report
2001-04-19 23:33 Re: GCC 3.0 Status Report

Michelle Lorenz

2001-04-03 00:36 limitations with gcov and STL

Mumit Khan

2001-04-07 16:58 Apply std errno patch of 2001-03-06 to 3.0 branch?

Nathan Myers

2001-04-05 22:29 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-07 01:45 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-07 02:42 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-07 03:01 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-08 22:37 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-10 17:58 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-10 18:04 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-19 13:33 Re: breaking compatibility
2001-04-26 03:15 Re: Doxygen comments in code

Nathan Sidwell

2001-04-27 05:17 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite

Neil Booth

2001-04-01 07:09 Re: backward -> deprecated
2001-04-05 22:01 Re: backward -> deprecated
2001-04-05 22:54 Re: backward -> deprecated
2001-04-07 03:25 cpplib: Honour #warning in system headers

Paolo Carlini

2001-04-13 08:15 cin (still) not working (for me)
2001-04-15 02:26 Re: cin (still) not working (for me)
2001-04-15 15:05 Re: cin (still) not working (for me)
2001-04-16 03:43 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code
2001-04-16 06:21 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code
2001-04-16 09:05 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code
2001-04-16 10:37 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checkingcode
2001-04-17 14:56 Thanks to you for your work! (was: Re: Boost regression testsuite results for...)
2001-04-17 17:41 Re: Thanks to you for your work! (was: Re: Boost regression testsuite results for...)
2001-04-18 06:44 "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-18 07:33 Re: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-18 10:23 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..."
2001-04-18 10:51 Re: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-18 10:59 Re: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-18 11:15 Re: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-18 11:20 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..."
2001-04-19 00:42 Re: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-25 09:29 Boost's call_traits_test.cpp
2001-04-25 11:18 Re: Boost's call_traits_test.cpp
2001-04-25 14:33 Re: Boost's call_traits_test.cpp

Paul J. Lucas

2001-04-17 08:24 __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong
2001-04-17 11:22 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong
2001-04-17 14:11 Re: __STL_NO_NAMESPACES is wrong

Peter Schmid

2001-04-01 16:15 Severe problems running the libstdc++ testsuite
2001-04-02 14:08 Some remarks running the testsuite
2001-04-03 12:17 [libstdc++] Patch for include/bits/stl_iterator_base_types.h
2001-04-04 10:09 Re: [libstdc++] Proposed patch for fstream.h
2001-04-05 10:20 Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-05 16:43 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-06 12:09 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-07 10:23 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-13 15:09 Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checkingcode
2001-04-16 09:32 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checkingcode
2001-04-16 15:49 Re: 21_strings/insert.cc on the mainline
2001-04-23 15:09 [libstc++] Problems with ext/slist (patch included)
2001-04-24 16:09 Strange warning while building the current libstdc++ library
2001-04-24 16:21 Problems with 22_locale/ctor_copy_dtor.cc
2001-04-25 10:33 Re: Boost's call_traits_test.cpp
2001-04-30 10:51 [libstdc++]: Proposed patch for libstdc++/2694
2001-04-30 11:28 Problem with your patch
2001-04-30 16:00 Problems with <limit> and nans

Phil Edwards

2001-04-02 17:31 [libstdc++] New implementation of concept checking
2001-04-03 13:00 Re: Compiling w/o gcc?
2001-04-03 13:07 Re: [v3] slight bugfix for tests_flags.in
2001-04-03 13:38 Re: [libstdc++] Patch for include/bits/stl_iterator_base_types.h
2001-04-04 13:20 Re: Compiling w/o gcc?
2001-04-04 15:21 [v3] doxygen tweaks
2001-04-05 08:45 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-05 10:07 Re: [v3] doxygen tweaks
2001-04-05 11:42 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-05 14:12 [v3] find doxygen in user's PATH
2001-04-06 11:12 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-06 11:21 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-06 11:27 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-06 11:32 Re: PATCH: Adhere to section 17.4.1.2 clause 5 of ISO 14882:1998
2001-04-06 11:54 [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot
2001-04-06 12:25 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-06 12:28 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot
2001-04-06 13:25 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-06 14:17 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot
2001-04-09 14:11 Re: [v3/wwwdocs] Update for new snapshot
2001-04-09 14:36 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-09 15:13 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-10 09:32 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-10 11:11 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-11 09:35 Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3
2001-04-11 10:36 Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
2001-04-12 23:53 Re: [libstdc++] New implementation of concept checking
2001-04-13 02:02 [v3] uglify concept-checking code
2001-04-13 02:34 [v3] std::equal using wrong concept check
2001-04-14 18:37 Re: Concept-checking code on branch
2001-04-14 18:44 Re: cin (still) not working (for me)
2001-04-15 14:27 Re: Concept-checking code on branch
2001-04-15 14:46 Re: cin (still) not working (for me)
2001-04-15 17:52 Re: Boost regression testsuite results for the improved new checking code
2001-04-16 08:11 Re: Question about allocator design
2001-04-16 13:32 21_strings/insert.cc on the mainline
2001-04-16 13:53 Re: 21_strings/insert.cc on the mainline
2001-04-17 16:17 [v3,trunk] disable a concept check for std::transform
2001-04-17 16:33 Re: Thanks to you for your work! (was: Re: Boost regression testsuite results for...)
2001-04-17 16:48 Re: [v3,trunk] disable a concept check for std::transform
2001-04-18 09:37 "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..."
2001-04-18 11:08 Re: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-18 11:09 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..."
2001-04-18 11:23 Re: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-18 11:28 Re: "the latest snapshot that will build 2.92..."
2001-04-19 14:23 Re: breaking compatibility
2001-04-19 15:01 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors
2001-04-19 16:04 [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-19 18:16 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-19 18:27 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors
2001-04-19 19:20 Re: [v3] concept check macros, excess-errors
2001-04-20 13:19 [v3,trunk] Replace old macro
2001-04-20 19:18 suggested --enable-concept-checks
2001-04-22 04:15 Re: 21_strings/insert.cc on the mainline
2001-04-22 04:42 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-24 18:54 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-25 02:12 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-25 02:20 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-25 05:39 Doxygen comments in code
2001-04-25 05:54 Re: suggested --enable-concept-checks
2001-04-27 13:15 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch
2001-04-28 17:29 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch
2001-04-28 18:43 Re: doxygen + char_traits, patch

RDBrown

2001-04-03 16:06 Shared libstd++ link failure on 3.0 0402 on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20

Rich Churcher

2001-04-11 07:16 Re: doxygen redux

Richard Andrews

2001-04-22 16:04 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-24 23:14 Re: example of killer doxygen formatting
2001-04-25 16:24 Re: Doxygen comments in code

Richard B. Kreckel

2001-04-16 06:15 Question about allocator design
2001-04-17 11:26 Re: Question about allocator design
2001-04-24 06:05 Re: Question about allocator design

Richard Henderson

2001-04-06 14:23 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2001-04-06 15:31 Re: Error building V3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Rob Taylor

2001-04-25 07:11 RE: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check

Robert Lipe

2001-04-17 08:24 libstdc++-v3 build failure
2001-04-27 09:07 Re: ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite

Ross Smith

2001-04-02 18:54 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-03 01:57 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-03 02:09 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?

Ryszard Kabatek

2001-04-17 05:27 bits/stl_algobase.h

Sam TH

2001-04-19 17:49 Re: [v3,trunk] Re: example of killer doxygen formatting

Stephen M. Webb

2001-04-18 07:28 RE: "unable to detect exception model"
2001-04-19 12:56 RE: breaking compatibility
2001-04-19 12:57 RE: libstdc++-v3 vs gcc-2.95.3
2001-04-20 10:54 RE: breaking compatibility

Steven King

2001-04-02 17:01 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 18:24 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?
2001-04-02 21:17 Re: Where is C++'s math.h's double abs(double)?

Theodore Papadopoulo

2001-04-06 10:41 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI
2001-04-06 12:34 Re: new concept checks and the 3.0 ABI

Timothy Wall

2001-04-13 05:15 static initialization woes

Tom Tromey

2001-04-24 10:08 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC
2001-04-24 15:25 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC
2001-04-24 18:47 Re: Get target libraries to obtain thread information from GCC

Travis Shirk

2001-04-04 16:03 Problems with gcc/libstdc++ on Solaris 8
2001-04-05 00:28 Problems with gcc/libstdc++ on Solaris 8

Ulrich Drepper

2001-04-05 19:17 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-05 19:53 Re: V3 PATCH: #undef some C99 math macros in <cmath>
2001-04-24 17:21 Re: gcc-3_0-branch cstdio=libio == libstdc++ doing miserable on make check

Yasir

2001-04-09 01:38 cin not working
2001-04-18 14:59 RE: "unable to detect exception model"

yxr72

2001-04-19 01:22 question
2001-04-19 01:29 question
2001-04-20 03:16 for help
2001-04-21 20:18 reply
2001-04-23 03:16 thank you

Zack Weinberg

2001-04-01 12:19 Remove bashism from libstdc++-v3/tests_flags.in
2001-04-02 14:36 libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement
2001-04-02 16:31 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement
2001-04-02 17:02 Re: libstdc++ test framework, minor improvement
2001-04-27 02:50 ridiculous memory consumption in libstdc++ test suite

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.7

libstdc++ archiveauthor index for April, 2001

libstdc++ archive
author index for April, 2001