This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

CVS libstdc++ vs. binutils version?

To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: CVS libstdc++ vs. binutils version?
From: Nathan Myers <ncm at nospam dot cantrip dot org>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 21:58:47 -0800
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010304112538.26744A@taarna.cygnus.com> <m3itlpiatk.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <flg0gtqoah.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <m3d7bxi8c3.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <20010304155715.B10160@disaster.jaj.com>
Reply-To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org

I am starting to get back into building CVS versions of gcc and
libstdc++, and am using Solaris 2.7.  Is binutils-2.10.1 good 
enough for building on that, or do I need something less released?
I gather that Sun's ld won't do.

Nathan Myers
ncm at cantrip dot org

Follow-Ups:
- bad gcc/libstdc++-v3 build on Solaris 7
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Re: CVS libstdc++ vs. binutils version?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: [patch RFC] cpp macro surgery
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [patch RFC] cpp macro surgery
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [patch RFC] cpp macro surgery
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [patch RFC] cpp macro surgery
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [patch RFC] cpp macro surgery
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]