RE: doxygen redux

[Greg Bumgardner <bumgard at roguewave dot com>]

I don't see why not. I use doxygen to generate documentation everytime I
build my own software. I've just made it part of my usual make. I think this
would be a great way to generate docs for the stdlib. These docs would even
be useful without any comment blocks.

I think I used one of the standard GNU build target hooks to accomplish
this. I build all of the docs in a subdirectory below my source tree root,
with separate subdirectories below that for the html, man, and latex output.
I've gotten pretty tricky with my HTML docs; I embed SSI directives that
come into play when the documentation is displayed online, but are ignored
when the pages are accessed locally or in a non-SSI environment. I also do a
little post processing on the html files during the make to produce
navigation bars at the top of each page.

-g.b

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benjamin Kosnik [mailto:bkoz@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 3:28 PM
> To: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: doxygen redux
> 
> 
> 
> did anybody else see that abiword started using doxygen? seems like
> they have scripts that auto-gen this stuff. Anyway this could 
> be used with v3?
> 
> -benjamin
> 
>