This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: __cplusplus revisited
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: __cplusplus revisited
- From: stephen dot webb at cybersafe dot com
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:59:28 -0500
- Cc: neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com, gdr at codesourcery dot com
- Organization: CyberSafe
- References: <20010212165341.A8852@disaster.jaj.com>
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:49:55PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> writes:
> >
> > | Are we going to define this properly? i.e. is someone going to look
> > | into what causes problems on Solaris? I don't have a Solaris box, so
> > | I can't help :-(
> >
> > Well, I don't have much time for this issue even though I think we
> > should tackle it seriously. Any patch is welcome.
>
> I have time and Solaris, but no clue.
>
> (That's goin' in a sig file somewhere, I'm sure...)
>
> More specifically, I have some Solaris 8 boxen, but no 7, and 7 is the
> version on the primary evaluation platform list. And no immediate ideas
> on how to fix the collision.
I have several flavours of Solaris. Could someone give me links to the problem and I'll see what I can do?
Stephen M. Webb