This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: __cplusplus revisited
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: __cplusplus revisited
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:53:41 -0500
- Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010212191714.A6162@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <fl7l2vpqx8.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:49:55PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> writes:
>
> | Are we going to define this properly? i.e. is someone going to look
> | into what causes problems on Solaris? I don't have a Solaris box, so
> | I can't help :-(
>
> Well, I don't have much time for this issue even though I think we
> should tackle it seriously. Any patch is welcome.
I have time and Solaris, but no clue.
(That's goin' in a sig file somewhere, I'm sure...)
More specifically, I have some Solaris 8 boxen, but no 7, and 7 is the
version on the primary evaluation platform list. And no immediate ideas
on how to fix the collision.
Phil
--
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.