This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: shadowed rel_ops operators



OK. It sounds like the rel_ops operators were a mistake to include in the
standard. So are there any plans to remove them from the standard?

What will be the standing of libstdc++ if rel_ops breaks libstdc++ or
vice-verse?

Is this a problem with other implementations of C++?


-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Myers


Yes.  It is not the iterator operators that break rel_ops, but rather
the rel_ops operators that break the iterator operators, as indeed they
break all similar operators.

The rel_ops operators are not useful.  They were a mistake.  If you 
insist on using them, you will have trouble.  Nobody will care, because 
you asked for it.  


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]