This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: armv4l bootstrap problem in libstdc++-v3
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: armv4l bootstrap problem in libstdc++-v3
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 18:59:12 +0000
- Cc: nickc at redhat dot com, stewart at nexus dot carleton dot ca, bkoz at redhat dot com, jason at redhat dot com, stewart at netwinder dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: rearnsha at arm dot com
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-To: rearnsha at arm dot com
>
> I know we went around on this; I'm sorry we dropped the ball.
>
> Nick/Richard, would one of you zap me the mail where Jason and I
> agreed on an answer? I'll take care of it today.
>
> --
> Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
jason@redhat.com said:
> I think that the bug is that we are setting TREE_PARMLIST on actual
> parameter lists; it is only useful to distinguish between semi-parsed
> parameter declarations and semi-parsed expressions. Once we have
> fully parsed the parm list, it serves no purpose.
mark@codesourcery.com said:
> Sounds right to me. And maybe just for safety we should use a
> TREE_LANG_FLAG for TREE_PARMLIST, rather than TREE_UNSIGNED?
jason@redhat.com said:
> Makes sense.
R.