This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <dr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 10 Jan 2001 12:33:41 +0100
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, Robert Lipe <robertl at sco dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <20001230160338.A3505@rjlhome.sco.com> <20001231000529.C20493@disaster.jaj.com> <fld7e84uiv.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010110010817.A5394@disaster.jaj.com> <20010110014205.A5535@disaster.jaj.com> <flg0irvqug.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010110010812.F4974@redhat.com>
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
| On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 07:55:19AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Maybe, it is time to add -iso to mean iso9899:1990 for it is somehow
| > counterintuitive not to recognize -std=c90 (== c89) AND recognize
| > -ansi as -std=iso9899:1990. That is just inconsistent.
|
| I thought we'd gotten them all the same. There must be
| lingering specs losage, or it was broken afterward.
OK.
| There will be no -iso option. That's what -std=c89 is for.
Hmm, I'm having some trouble to understand why the short for the
defaulted ISO standard should read '-ansi'. Could you elaborate
please?
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com