This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: a bug the rpm spec file or in the makefile ?

To: lfarkas at mindmaker dot hu
Subject: Re: a bug the rpm spec file or in the makefile ?
From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:59:27 +0200
CC: libstdc++ at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <395B6DAF.8D418EE4@mindmaker.hu> <20000629104438T.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <395C4F3C.C8145C12@mindmaker.hu> <200006300815.KAA03480@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de> <395C6E90.8A6E9C5C@mindmaker.hu>

> so if I use --enable_libstdcxx_v3 in gcc's configure option this may
> help?

Yes.

> and in this case the directory g++-3 will contain the v3's header
> files ?

No. They are installed into g++-v3.

> wouldn't be useful to "fix" this versioning stuff somehow ?

No. It's not broken.

Regards,
Martin

References:
- a bug the rpm spec file or in the makefile ?
  - From: Levente Farkas
- Re: a bug the rpm spec file or in the makefile ?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: a bug the rpm spec file or in the makefile ?
  - From: Levente Farkas
- Re: a bug the rpm spec file or in the makefile ?
  - From: Martin v. Loewis
- Re: a bug the rpm spec file or in the makefile ?
  - From: Levente Farkas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]