This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: LessThanComparable requirement overspecified?
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: LessThanComparable requirement overspecified?
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
- Date: 30 Jun 2000 01:24:24 +0200
- Cc: scott snyder <snyder at fnal dot gov>, austern at research dot att dot com, libstdc++ at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1000629160553.1902A-100000@cse.cygnus.com>
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| Matt I'm cc'ing you directly on this. Sorry if it's overkill.
|
| > I noticed that the latest update of the `STL' part of libstdc++
| > contains code to enforce the requirements on template parameters.
| > This is quite useful --- i've already found several instances in my
| > code where i was violating the spec.
|
| Yeah it seemed like a good idea to me too. I'm not quite sure the work to
| get clean error messages is worth it, but enforcing invariants and
| requirements is a great idea.
|
| Hey Gaby, any luck on getting human-readable error messages outta g++?
The necessary machinery should be finished by this week-end. Currently
I'm having a nasty sig11 error from the C-front-end, which makes me
nervous.
-- Gaby