This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header

To: libstdc++ at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header
From: Branko Čibej <branko dot cibej at hermes dot si>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 13:25:02 +0200
Organization: HERMES SoftLab
References: <20000517184840.A18015@store.zembu.com> <20000517201326.T28532@wolery.cumb.org> <3923832F.228EAA25@hermes.si> <20000517230455.B23068@shell7.ba.best.com>

Nathan Myers wrote:
> I'm interested.
> 
> I can see two reasons why it wasn't useful back then.  First, -isystem
> wasn't usable in C++, and the default (IMHO) wasn't right.

O.K., I'll clean up the patch.

Regarding the default ... I have no strong opinion either way.
I probably made -Wsystem-headers the default so as not to change
the compiler's behaviour. But I guess warnings from system headers
are interesting only for implementers of system headers, anyway :)

    Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej                 <branko.cibej@hermes.si>
HERMES SoftLab, Litijska 51, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
voice: (+386 1) 586 53 49     fax: (+386 1) 586 52 70

References:
- -isystem vs. #pragma system_header
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header
  - From: Branko Čibej
- Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header
  - From: Nathan Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]