This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
RE: Development status
- To: <libstdc++ at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: RE: Development status
- From: "Shiv Shankar Ramakrishnan" <ShivShanks at MailandNews dot com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:17:20 +0530
|work on the assumption that programs linked with libstdc++-v3 will be
|built with -fhonor-std and -fnew-abi if on gcc-2.95.2. The build
Yes I agree that it would be nice if we could have -fhonor-std and
-fnew-abi. Does -fnew-abi mean -fsquangle also? I am a little unclear
here as to what the deal about -fsquangle is? Is it meant to be stop
gap arrangement for NON -fnew-abi code, since -fnew-abi doesn't have the
problems which needed -fsquangle (or it does -fsquangle by default)?
What I'm worried about is template code bloat without -fsquangle. I've
seen some examples without -fsquangle that scared me. They were contri-
ved though. Like for example would code using libstdc++ get very bloated
without -fsquangle? Maybe I'm missing something basic here?
Thanks,
Shiv