This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [2.90.9] planning for the next release
- To: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
- Subject: Re: [2.90.9] planning for the next release
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
- Date: 29 Mar 2000 11:07:30 +0200
- Cc: bkoz at cygnus dot com, libstdc++ at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS UMR 8536 (France)
- References: <200003290308.TAA00899@haight.constant.com> <200003290610.IAA00543@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Reply-To: libstdc++ at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
"Martin v. Loewis" <martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
| > In an ongoing effort to make libstdc++ development easier, I thought
| > I'd post some tentative ideas about what might be attempted for the
| > next snapshot.
|
| Instead of having another release, I think adding the libstdc++ tree
| into the GCC tree seems to be the next logical step to me. In my view,
| there should be an option --enable-libstdc++-v3 in Cygnus configure
| (which would be the second after --enable-gdbgui), and the libstdc++
| v3 tree would live side-by-side with the v2
| tree. --enable-libstdc++-v3 would also have effect on gcc
| configuration, such as enabling namespaces by default, having a
| different g++ include dir, and so on.
Sounds reasonable to me. Ben, do you have any objection?
-- Gaby