Re: Testresults: armv4l-unknown-linux-gnu

[Rod Stewart <stewart at netwinder dot org>]

On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

> Thanks for these results! I suspect this is with an -O2 (default)
> build: is there anyway we could get at least one unoptimized build?
> (You can enable this at configure time with --enable-debug)

Tomorrow's results will be built with --enable-debug.  Yes, the current
build was with default (-O2).

> I do really dig the way the netwinder team displays the results: so
> nice.  I've started looking at the page daily just to give me a heads
> up on build status.

The 'really' bad scripts I use are availble in the autobuild directory on
the netwinder.org ftp site if any else is interested in setting up
something similar.

Apparently I had a problem with the ARM builds, which failed at the end,
deleting the build trees.  Hopefully this will magically disapears in
tomorrow's build.

> Good news: arm native works.
> 
> Bad news: I still cannot get x86-x-arm-elf to build for me, as of this
> afternoon's CVS I get (should I try strongarm-elf?):

The --with-cpu=strongarm, simply adds in a few more instructions which are
in armv4 CPUs, which were not in armv3 CPUs.  Building for armv3 CPU
support is the default.  You should be able to build a standard arm-elf
cross compiler, although I've not tried to build one in months.

-Rms