Re: broken configury, testing for 'ld'

[Alexandre Oliva <oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br>]

On Nov 28, 2000, Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> wrote:

> IMHO, it would be better to delete LD and LD_FOR_TARGET from the
> toplevel Makefile.  All this stuff should be using GCC to link anyway,
> or at least to find the linker.

Sounds reasonable to me.  I hope there isn't any target module using
LD directly.

> The problem then is that in a combined tree, we want to use ld/ld-new...

GCC will be able to find it, since gcc/configure creates links within
the gcc directory.

> OK.  (I can't argue with that, since I worked around the problem by
> specifying LD myself to the toplevel Makefile... :-)

:-)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me