This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: broken configury, testing for 'ld'
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: broken configury, testing for 'ld'
- From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br>
- Date: 28 Nov 2000 21:18:14 -0200
- Cc: libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <200011282302.PAA01138@geoffk.org>
On Nov 28, 2000, Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> wrote:
> and then passes LD_FOR_TARGET as $LD to the libstdc++ configure.
If GCC has a different idea of what LD_FOR_TARGET is than what
LD_FOR_TARGET says, then it is LD_FOR_TARGET that should be fixed.
> Is this test really supposed to be checking for the ld used by GCC?
Yes but, following autoconf practice, this test (from libtool, BTW)
lets the user override it, under the assumption that, if the user
specifies it, s/he either knows better or s/he's overriding it on
purpose.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me