This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: G++ test failures

To: bkoz at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: G++ test failures
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:01:55 -0800
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20001122105855C.mitchell@codesourcery.com><Pine.SOL.3.91.1001122114102.1274C-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>

>>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

    Benjamin> I would suggest that the g++ testcases use
    Benjamin> non-deprecated parts of the library, thus side-stepping
    Benjamin> this issue.

The reason for those test-cases is not to test the library -- it's to
test the compiler's ability to handle constructs in those header files
that used to cause problems.  So, we'd like to keep the test-cases.

It seems like from what you say, though, that everything is OK: the
test-cases now work independent of whether or not strstream.h is in
std, and you'll want a backwards-compatibility header called
strstream.h anyhow, right?

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: G++ test failures
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- G++ test failures
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: G++ test failures
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]