This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: C++: const_iterator not comparable to iterator for map<>s
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: C++: const_iterator not comparable to iterator for map<>s
- From: Gabriel Dos_Reis <Gabriel dot Dos_Reis at sophia dot inria dot fr>
- Date: 17 Nov 2000 23:00:56 +0100
- Cc: Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
- Organization: I.N.R.I.A Sophia-Antipolis (France)
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1001117132308.7906D-100000@cse.cygnus.com>
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
| > No problem (I hope), I'll try to do that.
| > Is a modification of the test 23_containers/map_operators.cc
| > acceptable ? Or should I create a different test ?
|
| I suspect we'll need two files. We need both positive (should compile)
| and negative (should not compile) tests.
Hmm, if we're going to use DejaGnu shouldn't it suffice to mark FAIL
or PASS, or am I being dense?
-- Gaby