This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: C++: const_iterator not comparable to iterator for map<>s
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: C++: const_iterator not comparable to iterator for map<>s
- From: Gabriel Dos_Reis <Gabriel dot Dos_Reis at sophia dot inria dot fr>
- Date: 17 Nov 2000 22:51:32 +0100
- Cc: Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Organization: I.N.R.I.A Sophia-Antipolis (France)
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0011172218070.83206-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
| On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
| > No problem (I hope), I'll try to do that.
| > Is a modification of the test 23_containers/map_operators.cc
| > acceptable ? Or should I create a different test ?
|
| Shouldn't this stuff go into the main GCC testsuite?
No, it is a library issue.
| Unless I am mistaken, libstdc++-v3/testsuite is not executed by
| `make check` and thus regressions won't be caught?
There is a special target rule.
But V3 testsuite is being converted to DejaGnu framework. So they will
be caught by a regular make check-g++ in the not so distant future.
-- Gaby