This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: C++: const_iterator not comparable to iterator for map<>s
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: C++: const_iterator not comparable to iterator for map<>s
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 13:22:37 -0800 (PST)
- cc: Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
> > No problem (I hope), I'll try to do that.
> > Is a modification of the test 23_containers/map_operators.cc
> > acceptable ? Or should I create a different test ?
>
> Shouldn't this stuff go into the main GCC testsuite?
no this is a library bug. we need a library regression test for it
> Unless I am mistaken, libstdc++-v3/testsuite is not executed by
> `make check` and thus regressions won't be caught?
run `make check-target-libstdc++-v3`
-benjamin