Re: AIX status

[Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>]

> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h: In function 
>    `std::basic_istream<_CharT, _Traits>& 
>    std::operator>>(std::basic_istream<_CharT, _Traits>&, 
>    std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>&) [with _CharT = __wchar_t, 
>    _Traits = std::char_traits<__wchar_t>, _Alloc = std::allocator<__wchar_t>]':
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/misc-inst.cc:201:   instantiated from here
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h:1126: warning: comparison
>    between signed and unsigned integer expressions
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h: At global scope:
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h: In instantiation of `std::vector<std::locale::facet*, std::allocator<std::locale::facet*> >':
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/localefwd.h:77:   instantiated from `std::use_facet(const std::locale&) [with _Facet = std::codecvt<char, char, char*>]'
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/fstream.tcc:84:   instantiated from `std::basic_filebuf<_CharT, _Traits>::basic_filebuf() [with _CharT = char, _Traits = std::char_traits<char>]'
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/misc-inst.cc:79:   instantiated from here
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h:161: `_Assignable_concept_specification<_Type>::_Assignable_requirement_violation'
>    is not a valid template argument
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h:161: Tree check: 
>    expected tree_vec, have error_mark
> /u/dje/src/GNU/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h:161: Internal 
>    compiler error in , at cp/pt.c:3526
>    Please submit a full bug report.
>    See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
> make: *** [misc-inst.o] Error 1

Hmm. 

> 	With the current sources, the std_cmath.h error which I reported
> earlier does not appear.

Great. There was a lot of movement in the compiler WRT this issue as well 
last week, so I suspect it's more of that than the header, per se. 

It doesn't really matter, however, as long as this is ok.

> 	I am continuing to encourage the various IBM and non-IBM
> developers of AIX support in libtool to get their changes merged and
> committed.

Thanks.

Am I correct in assuming that the mknumeric_limits patch is no longer 
necessary? That would be great. If there is any divergence between CVS 
and your build tree's sources, can you please post it?

-benjamin